|
|||
| Thursday, February 14, 2013 | |||
|
 More News Nomination Deadline Extended to Feb. 26 for AUA's Two AP Faculty Awards As the evaluation cycle for AP faculty comes to an end later this semester, a good way to recognize and celebrate the success stories of a colleague for the past academic year is to nominate him or her for one of two Association of University Administrators (AUA) awards. The deadline for both the 2013 AUA J. Worth Pickering Administrator of the Year Award and the 2013 AUA Monarch Professional Award has been extended through Tuesday, Feb. 26. Details and nomination criteria for each award are listed below. J. WORTH PICKERING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE YEAR AWARD Include specific descriptions/evidence of how your nominee exceeds expectations of an administrator in the following categories listed below. Letters of nomination should not exceed three pages. Nominators are encouraged to provide supporting letters and are responsible for collecting all supporting letters and materials. Letters should reference the 2013 J. Worth Pickering Administrator of the Year Award. Submit nomination packets by 5 p.m. no later than Tuesday, Feb. 26, to: Trey Mayo AUA President-elect 1200 E.V. Williams Engineering and Computational Sciences Building Re: 2013 J. Worth Pickering Administrator of the Year Award Final selection will be made by a committee of former Administrator of the Year award recipients. Eligibility: Nominees must: • Be designated by the university to be an AP faculty member. • Have a body of work that support the categories listed below. Any AP faculty member, regardless of position title, may be nominated for this award. If you are unsure about your nominee's eligibility, call Human Resources at 683-3042 for clarification. Criteria for the AUA J. Worth Pickering Administrator of the Year Award: The nominee should demonstrate outstanding performance in each of the following areas: SERVICE Evidence of major contributions that have made an impact on either the campus community or the off-campus community. EFFECTIVENESS Evidence of leadership, irrespective of administrative position; advocacy for students and/or staff; contributions to morale; improvements of processes and procedures; motivational, inspirational leadership style. PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT Evidence that the nominee has excelled in presentations, publications, teaching, research, continuing education and/or recognition by professional organizations which benefited the University. OTHER Evidence of any outstanding qualities not categorized above. AUA MONARCH PROFESSIONAL AWARD The objective of this award is to recognize mid-level administrators and professionals with a developing body of work at the university who demonstrate exceptional performance in their position. The developing body of work should support at least one of the categories below. Letters of nomination should not exceed three pages and nomination packets shall not exceed 20 pages. Nominators are encouraged to provide supporting letters and are responsible for collecting all supporting letters and materials. Letters should reference the 2013 AUA Monarch Professional Award. Submit nomination packets by 5 p.m. no later than Tuesday, Feb. 26, to: Bev Forbes AUA Past President 132 Kaufman Hall Re: 2013 AUA Monarch Professional Award Final selection will be made by a committee of former Administrator of the Year award recipients. ELIGIBILITY: Nominees must: • Be designated by the university to be an AP Faculty member; • Be at the level of director or lower in terms of position title; and, • Have made a major contribution to the Monarch community within a reasonably recent time frame. If you are unsure about your nominee's eligibility, contact Human Resources at 683-3042 for assistance. Criteria for the AUA Monarch Professional Award: The nominee should demonstrate exceptional performance in the following areas including, but not limited to: SERVICE Evidence of contributions that have made an impact on the campus community. EFFECTIVENESS Evidence of leadership, irrespective of administrative position; advocacy for students and/or staff; contributions to morale; improvements of processes and procedures. PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT Evidence that the nominee has excelled in presentations, publications, teaching, research, continuing education and/or recognition by professional organizations which benefited the university. |
|||
|